- The High Performance Playbook
- Posts
- Why the Supplement Industry Is Winning and Your Health Is Losing
Why the Supplement Industry Is Winning and Your Health Is Losing
Your labs came back normal. So why do you still feel terrible?
Hey ,
I want to talk about something I've had a front-row seat to for over two decades.
I've been in health and fitness my entire adult life as an operator, an entrepreneur, and someone who genuinely obsesses over what actually works versus what just sounds like it should work.
And one of the most uncomfortable truths I've landed on?
The supplement industry, at large, is not designed to make you healthier. It's designed to make you keep buying.
Before you click away thinking I'm about to tell you everything you're taking is garbage, that's not what this is. Some supplements are genuinely useful and backed by real science.
But the industry wrapped around them? That deserves a hard look.
Why the Supplement Industry Is Winning and Your Health Is Losing
The global supplement market is worth over $60 billion.
That number alone should make you pause, not because it's big, but because of what it implies. An industry of that size is not built on one-time purchases from people who got results and moved on. It's built on repeat buyers who are perpetually searching.
And that's the tell.
The Business Model Depends On Your Confusion
Here's something the industry doesn't advertise:
Confusion is a feature, not a bug.
When there are 47 different magnesium formulations, 12 types of protein powder, and an endless parade of "breakthrough" ingredients every 6 months, the average consumer doesn't get smarter. They get more reliant on the brands, influencers, and affiliate marketers who are being paid to steer them.
The supplement industry spends billions on marketing and almost nothing on long-term outcome studies.
Long-term outcome studies would answer the question nobody in that business wants answered:
Is any of this actually moving the needle for the person taking it?
The Cherry-Picked Study Problem
This is where it gets particularly frustrating.
Supplement companies are legally permitted to make "structure/function" claims — meaning they can say a product "supports immune health" or "promotes metabolic function" without ever proving it does so in the population taking it at the dose being sold.
What they'll often do instead is cite a single study… sometimes conducted on a completely different population, at a different dosage, over a short timeframe, and plaster it across the marketing as proof.
A study showing that 2,000mg of a compound improved insulin sensitivity in sedentary men over 65 does not mean the 500mg capsule you bought at the grocery store is going to do anything for a 38-year-old woman.
But it sounds credible. And in this industry, sounding credible is enough.
No Accountability, No Consequences
Here's the regulatory reality: dietary supplements in the U.S. do not require FDA approval before they go to market.
Manufacturers are responsible for ensuring their own products are safe and accurately labeled, a system that, as you might imagine, has significant gaps.
Third-party testing exists, and some companies use it. But it's voluntary.
Even tested products can't account for the most fundamental problem: whether what's in the bottle will actually do what you're hoping it will do for your specific biology.
Your metabolic health, your hormonal status, your inflammatory markers, and your gut function all affect how your body responds to any given compound.
A blanket supplement protocol built on marketing rather than clinical data isn't personalized care. It's an expensive guess.
What Actually Moves The Needle
I want to be clear: I'm not anti-supplement. I take several things regularly, and they're part of how I perform at the level I do.
But here's the difference between what works and what doesn't, and it has nothing to do with which brand you're buying:
Context is everything.
The supplements that actually move the needle are the ones chosen based on your baseline (your labs, your deficiencies, your metabolic state, your goals).
Not based on what's trending, what an influencer is promoting, or what the guy at GNC recommended.
Vitamin D supplementation is meaningless if your levels are already sufficient, and potentially counterproductive at the wrong dose.
Magnesium glycinate is outstanding for sleep and nervous system regulation, but only if poor sleep is actually rooted in a magnesium deficiency.
Omega-3s matter enormously, but dosage and form affect bioavailability in ways most labels don't explain.
The difference between a supplement helping and a supplement doing nothing is almost always whether someone actually looked at your individual picture first.
That's not something a $29 bottle can do. That requires a clinician.
The Real Question To Ask
The next time you're standing in a supplement aisle or clicking "add to cart" on something that promises to transform your energy, metabolism, or body composition, ask yourself one question:
Does anyone who has actually looked at my health data recommend this for me specifically?
If the answer is no, you're not optimizing. You're guessing. And the industry is counting on you to keep doing exactly that.
Where This Is All Going
One of the things we built Kora MD around is the belief that real metabolic health support starts with real clinical data. Not a quiz, not a generic protocol, not a supplement bundle designed to upsell you every 30 days.
Physician-reviewed labs. A care team that actually knows your history. Recommendations that are grounded in your biology.
That's a fundamentally different model. And with Kora MD® launching in April, it's one that's about to become accessible in a way it hasn't been before.
More on that soon.
Quick Question For You:
Have you ever tried peptides? |
More coming soon,

Austin L. Wright

Join my inner circle - Follow me on X for daily business breakdowns, lifestyle hacks, and a behind-the-scenes look at what my team and I are building.
Follow me on IG to see how I’m living the blueprint. I practice what I preach.
P.S.
We’re always looking to improve and create better newsletters for you in the future. If you have any feedback or suggestions for future editions, I’d love to hear from you! Just reply directly to this email and give me some ideas for how you think we could make it better!
If you’re reading this online, make sure you subscribe using the button below:
Disclaimer: The ideas shared in this newsletter are those of the author, and this is in no way intended to be medical, legal, or financial advice. Always do your own research and consult with licensed professionals.
Reply